Reply to the letter from Dr. Miao et al.

Environmental gamma radiation: a comment (Letter to the Editor)

Editor, I read the recent publication by Toossi et al. with a great interest (1). Toossi et al. concluded that “Average gonad and bone marrow doses for North Khorasan, Boshehr and Hormozgan provinces were less than the corresponding values for normal area (2).” There are some facts on this report to be concerned. I agree that the detected levels might be high in the mentioned area, but th...

Letter to editor

Dear Prof. Mozdarani,I would like to discuss about some important aspects regarding the article published in, "Iran. J. Radiat. Res., 2012 10(2): 89-94“ with title of “Patient doses from X-ray computed tomography examinations by a single-array detector unit: Axial versus spiral mode" by Ghavami et al. (1), so according to journal policy and in suitable manner please ask the authors to rep...

Reply Letter

We thank Dr Bettinger et al for the clarification, and for providing valuable updates on the current epidemiology and surveillance of meningococcal disease in Canada. The objective of our review was to provide an overview of the epidemiology of meningococcal disease in North America during the last half century and portray how it has evolved over time, particularly in response to the different ...

Comment to the Letter to the Editor: Subjective Symptoms Related to GSM Radiation from Mobile Phone Base Stations: a cross-sectional study In reply to the comments by Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi

Reply: The C-CURE Randomized Clinical Trial (Cardiopoietic stem Cell therapy in heart failURE).

A letter to the editor has been submitted to the Journal by Dr. Darrel P. Francis and colleagues regarding the paper by Bartunek et al. (1). Due to the nature, detail, and length of the letter and the corresponding reply, the editors have made a decision to waive the usual word limit and timelines for letters and replies so as to provide a full airing of the issues for our readers. However, giv...